Compare the short story Flowers for Algernon Essay Example for Free

Compare the laconic story Flowers for Algernon quizThe differences among Flowers for Algernon as a shortstop story and as a movie represent the differences amidst the two media. In my essay I am going to fork up, from the differences between the short story and the movie, the differences between the two media, coming up with the conclusion that the short story is the better medium by which to aver this story.One of the most signifi preservet differences between the short story and the movie is the developing of Charlies instance in the story. In the book for example, is nothing said astir(predicate) his family, whereas in the movie is told a lot some his childhood and in the end he also sees his mother. When we see Charlie in the movie mentioning himself as l onenessly, he becomes a much described character than he is in the book. This shows the difference that in a short story we have to develop a character ourselves, but in a movie hardly throughout one picture of a person we already get a description of this character we would never have got in a short story. In the movie we have seen the information about Charlie we immediately get it supported by information about his family.There are also divergent kinds of pathos in short story and movie. With the identification of Charlie Ms Kinnian and in in a flash Algernon with the loneliness in the movie, they identify themselves as sad. This makes the movie much more(prenominal) pathetic than the short story, because in the short story solely the identifying between Charlie and Algernon takes place, which is much less pathetic. What also support the pathos in the movie is the whole perception around the relationship between Charlie and Ms Kinnian. This could represent the fact that a movie has to be more emotional than a short story, so that the people want to see it. But it could also show that someone who is making a movie has to bring in more pathos in his story, because he shows the story o mniscient. That means he has not the chance to tell the story in diary-form and so directly out of the brain of the main character which is much more personal. With short story as diary-form you can see everything through the eyes of the diary writer.To compare the roles of the doctors, doing the operation, also brings up a big difference. In the movie there is no Dr. Nemur, who plays a big role inthe short story. In the short story Dr. Nemur represents the scientific being, which is not always human. Dr. Strauss plays the good, personal and human guy, which also cares about Charlies feelings and his psychology. Now in the movie there is only Dr. Strauss, who then has to represent the scientific world but also has to be the good guy. So two flat characters from the short story can be put into one character in the movie. Because Dr. Strauss is representing two characters, he becomes a grotesque person. This happens, because he has to represent a scientific society, which does not ha ve ethics as basis but also has to represent a world of humanity and ethics, which in the short story represent Dr. Nemur.In my opinion the short story is the more successful medium by which to tell the story, because the movie creates you through a lot of emotions one specialized opinion about what happens to Charlie. Whereas in the short story you have more chance to create your own opinion about the story, which is a very important thing in stories but also in your life.